M RAJ KUMARI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, NCC-23(1), CHENNAI

This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Chennai, in 18/CIT(A)-10 dated 27.09.2018 relevant to the Assessment Year 2015-16.

By filing Form No.5, it was the submission of the learned counsel for the assessee through e-mail that the assessee paid the dues under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the designated authority has issued Form No.5 on 26.03.2021. Thus, it was prayed for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. Against which, the learned DR fairly conceded the submissions of the learned counsel.

We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the Form No.5.

We find that the assessee has already paid the dues under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, thereby, the designated authority has issued Form No.5 and thus, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.