REDINGTON (INDIA) LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee can approach the Tribunal if any injustice arises from the settlement.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 for settlement of a pending tax dispute. Consequently, Form No. 3 was issued by the Designated Authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
M/s. Redington (India) Ltd., The Dy. Commissioner of SPL Guindy House, Income Tax, No.95, Mount Road, Vs. Corporate Circle-5(1), Chennai-600 032. Chennai. [PAN: AABCR 0347P] (अपीलाथ(/Appellant) ()*थ(/Respondent) अपीलाथ( की ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. Saroj Kumar Parida, Advocate )*थ( की ओर से /Respondent by : Mr. G. Srinivasa Rao, CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 28.06.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 28.06.2021 आदेश / O R D E R PER SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Chennai in dated 29.09.2017 relevant to the Assessment Year 2005-06. 2 -: 2. When this appeal is taken up for hearing, vide letter dated 25.03.2021, the learned Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has also submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the assessee.
We have heard both the sides through video conferencing, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
In this case, the assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, he prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the submissions of the assessee, the appeal filed by the assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application 3 -: in the event of any injustice caused to the assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 28th June, 2021 in Chennai. (एस. जयरामन) (वी दुगा" राव) (V. DURGA RAO) (S. JAYARAMAN) लेखा सद" /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "याियक "याियक सद"य "याियक "याियक सद"य सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER सद"य चे"ई/Chennai, "दनांक/Dated: 28th June, 2021. EDN, Sr. P.S
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026