M/S FIRST ADVANTAGE GLOBAL OPERATING CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 56/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 September 2020AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that keeping the appeal pending would serve no purpose since the assessee had already initiated the dispute settlement process. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee sought an adjournment of their appeal as they had filed applications under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for dispute settlement. The Revenue argued that the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, as per the Act's provisions.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Appellant: Shri L. Bharath, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Priya Darshini Mishra, D.R
Hearing: 14.09.2020Pronounced: 15.09.2020

PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 12-11-2018 passed by Ld CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance of expenses of Rs.97.94 lakhs made by the AO. 2. The authorised representative of the assessee has moved a letter dated 11th day of September, 2020 seeking adjournment of the appeal. In that letter, it is stated that the assessee has filed

M/s. First Advantage Global Operating Centre Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 2 of 3 application in Form 1 and Form 2 under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute. According, the Ld A.R prayed for adjournment.

3.

The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.

4.

The Ld A.R, in the rejoinder, submitted that the assessee should be given liberty to seek recall of the order, if the appeal is dismissed by the bench.

5.

We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has already filed applications in Form 1 and Form 2 under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said Act, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.

6.

The assessee has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department. Hence the assessee has sought adjournment till the time Form no.3 is received from the department, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue.

M/s. First Advantage Global Operating Centre Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 3 of 3 Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Pronounced in the open Court on 15-09-2020

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →