ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING vs. SEMI CONDUCTOR LABORATORY , SCL PH-, INDUSTRIAL AREA,
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
PER RAJ PAL YADAV, VP The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 07.03.2024 passed for assessment year 2016-17. ITA 522/CHD/2024 A.Y. 2016-17 2
The Revenue has filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal.
The contents of the application read as under :
“In this case filing of further appeal was not recommended by your office.
However, the appeal proceeding were pending for Assessment years 2010-11,
A.Y. 2011-12 and A.Y. 2013-14 to 2015-16 on the same issue before the Hon'ble
Punjab & Haryana High Court . Therefore, further filing appeal was recommended in this case as per circular No.08/2023. Now, in this case pending appeals before the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High
Court has been withdrawn due to low tax effect as per Circular 09/2024. As the grounds for filing of appeal does not exist due to low tax effect and not falling under any exception. Therefore, you are directed to withdraw the appeal pending before the ITAT for the A. Y. 2016-17."
In view of the above facts and circumstances, the appeal of the Revenue is treated as dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 28.04.2025. (KRINWANT SAHAY)
VICE PRESIDENT
“Poonam”
आदेश क ितिलिप अ ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथ/ The Appellant
2. यथ/ The Respondent
3. आयकर आयु/ CIT
4. िवभागीय ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, चडीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH
5. गाड फाईल/ Guard File
आदेशानुसार/ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार/