DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI vs. VIRGO PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

This appeal filed by the Revenue is delayed by ‘08’ days, for which, the AO has filed the affidavit for ‘09’ days requesting for condonation of delay, to which, the Ld.Counsel of the assessee has :- 2 -: not raised any serious objection. Consequently, the delay of ‘08’ days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and accordingly, the Revenue’s appeal is disposed off.

When this appeal was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. It has submitted that it may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.

On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.

We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.

In this case, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, it was prayed that the appeal filed by the Revenue may be permitted to be withdrawn. :- 3 -:

In view of the submissions of the ld.Counsel for Assessee, the appeal filed by the Revenue is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee/Revenue to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee/Revenue in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in is dismissed as withdrawn.