HASHAM INVESTMENTS & TRADING CO PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-11(4), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2484/BANG/2017Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 October 2020AY 2009-103 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, noting that keeping the appeal pending would serve no purpose as the assessee had already initiated the settlement process. Liberty was granted to the assessee to seek recall of the order if necessary.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee had also filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute. The assessee requested an adjournment pending the settlement process.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be adjourned or dismissed given the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN

For Appellant: Shri B.K. Manjunath, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, D.R
Hearing: 06.10.2020Pronounced: 06.10.2020

PER GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 25-09-2017 passed by the CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru for assessment year 2009-10 u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short].

2.

The assessee has furnished a letter dated October 05, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessee has filed application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and Form no.3 is awaited. Accordingly, the assessee has prayed that the appeal may be adjourned.

Hasham Investment and Trading Company Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore

3.

The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal. The Ld D.R further submitted that, in this type of cases, the Tribunal is giving liberty to seek recall of the order, if the appeal is dismissed by the bench.

4.

We heard the parties and perused the record. The submissions made by Ld D.R is considered. Since the assessee has already filed applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said Act, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.

5.

The Ld A.R has stated that he has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department and the process will be completed upon receipt of Form no.3, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.

Hasham Investment and Trading Company Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 3 of 3

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 6th Oct, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →