JAYANTILAL TOKERSHI DEDHIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - CIRCLE 2, KALYAN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO for re-computation of gains, considering the reassessment for AY 2012-13, to provide the available relief to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold flats and shops during AY 2015-16, reporting long-term capital gains. The AO treated these gains as short-term and proposed taxing them in AY 2012-13, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee sought relief for gains already taxed in AY 2012-13.
What were the issues?
Whether capital gains already taxed in a prior assessment year should be considered for the current assessment year, and the need for re-computation based on subsequent reassessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 07/12/2020 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 04/01/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [in short referred to as ‘AY’] 2015-16 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-3, Thane [in short referred to as ‘CIT(A)’], Appeal No.10201-THN/17-18 dated 01/08/2018 on certain grounds of appeal.
2 Jayantilal Tokershi Dedhia Assessment Year: 2015-16 2. The Ld. AR for assessee, at the outset, pressed only for additional grounds of appeal in view of the fact that another assessment has been framed subsequently for AY 2012-13 u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Act and the same has bearing on the issue. The additional ground of appeal read as under: - On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the appellant may please be allowed a relief to the extent of the value of flats / shops which has already been taxed in A.Y.2012-13 vide assessment order dated 27-12-2018 passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act and thereby reducing the capital gain arising upon transfer of said flats /shops during the year under consideration to that extent.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026