M/S.CLEAR SECURED SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-6(2)(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7302/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 January 2021AY 2013-143 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention that the annual accounts for AY 2012-13 were not considered. The assessment was framed without considering these crucial documents.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2013-14. The CIT(A) had noted incomplete annual accounts for 2012-13. The assessee argued that these accounts were filed and not considered by the TPO/AO.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment was validly framed without considering the assessee's annual accounts for the preceding year. The need for a fresh assessment to consider all contentions.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI

For Appellant: Shri Devendra Jain, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan, D.R
Hearing: 09.12.2020Pronounced: 08.01.2021

Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member:

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 24.10.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2013-14.

2.

The assessee has raised several grounds and challenged the order of Ld. CIT(A) on legal as well as on merit.

3.

After hearing both the parties and perusing the material on record, we find that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order by observing that the assessee has filed annual accounts pertaining to 2012-13 which were too incomplete whereas the assessee has 2 M/s. Clear Secured Services Pvt. Ltd. convinced us that all these accounts were duly filed before the authorities below by pointing out the specific documents in the paper book to corroborate his submissions that all the informations were duly filed before the authorities below. We find merit in the contention of the assessee that the same were not considered and TPO/AO and the assessment was framed without considering the annual accounts for A.Y. 2012-13. Both the sides prayed before the Bench that the issue may kindly be restored to the file of the AO so that the issue involved could be decided denovo with all contentions and issues of the assessee to remain open. In other words the assessee is at liberty to raise legal issues as well as the issues on merit. Accordingly, we are restoring the appeal of the assessee to the file of the TPO/AO to frame the assessment afresh and denovo after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is at liberty to raise all the issues including legal issues before the TPO/AO. Accordingly, the appeal is restored to the file of the AO/TPO to decide in terms of above directions.

4.

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 08.01.2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →