POLYCOM TECHNOLOGY ( R & D) CENTER P.LTD,HYDERABAD vs. ASST CIT CIR 7(3)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6617/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 January 2021AY 2009-102 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, acknowledging the assessee's application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to seek restoration if the application is not accepted.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for the assessment year 2009-10. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's intention to settle the tax dispute through a government scheme, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 254

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR & SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY

For Appellant: Shri Mihir CHitalia (AR)
For Respondent: Shri Ashish K Heliwal (DR)

O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey (JM),

This is an appeal by the assessee against assessment order dated 28-9-2018 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) and 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. The learned Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submitted that assessee has opted for settling the dispute arising in this appeal by filing application under the Direct Tax “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. In support, copies of Forms No.1 and 2 were submitted before us. On a suggestion from the Bench, the learned Counsel fairly accepted that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn, however, the assessee may be protected by granting liberty to seek restoration of the appeal if, due to some unforeseen reasons, the application filed under the “Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020” is not accepted by the department.

3.

The learned Departmental Representative did not have any objection to the aforesaid submission.

4. Having heard the parties and considering the fact that the assessee has already applied for settling the dispute arising in the present appeal under the “Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020”, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal as withdrawn. However, in the unlikely event of assessee’s application filed under the “Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020” being not accepted by the department, liberty is granted to the assessee to seek recall of this order and restoration of the appeal.

4.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed with the aforementioned liberty.

More judgments on Section 144C(13)

All 3,426 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(13) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →