K - LIFESTYLE & INDUSTRIES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 5(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6309/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 January 2021AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal treated the appeal as dismissed and withdrawn, granting liberty to the assessee to have it restored if the Vivad Se Viswas declaration is later declared bad in law.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020, to settle the tax dispute.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the pendency of an appeal before the tribunal in light of the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM

For Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Jha, CIT-DR
Hearing: 12/01/2021Pronounced: 12/01/2021

आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):

1.

This appeal in A.Y.2015-16 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-53/IT-435/DCCC-5(3)/2017-18 dated 20/08/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 26/12/2017 by the ld. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-5(3) (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

M/s. K.Lifestyle Industries Ltd.

2.

We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 16/12/2020 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the year under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.

3.

In view of this, we hereby treat the appeal pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/01/2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 12/01/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps

M/s. K.Lifestyle Industries Ltd.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →