← Back to search

GURMEET KAUR,KURUKSHETRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KURUKSHETRA

PDF
ITA 934/CHANDI/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 June 20252 pages

1

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT
AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

आयकरअपील सं. / ITA No. 934/CHANDI/2024
(िनधाŊरणवषŊ / Assessment Year: 2012-13)
Ms. Gurmeet Kaur
Village Gangheri, Pehowa
Kurukshetra Haryana 136128
बनाम/
Vs.
ITO
Ward 1
Kurukshetra
̾थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No DUKPK-9615-J
(अपीलाथŎ/Appellant)
:
(ŮȑथŎ / Respondent)

अपीलाथŎकीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal (CA) – Ld. AR
ŮȑथŎकीओरसे/Respondent by :
Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR

सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
27-05-2025
घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
02-06-2025

आदेश / O R D E R

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012- 13 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeals Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 26- 10-2023 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] on best judgment basis u/s. 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 29-11-2019. The sole grievance of the assessee is addition of Rs.108.39 Lacs. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, the appeal is disposed-off as under. The registry has noted delay of 250 days in the appeal, which stand condoned.

2.

Upon perusal of orders of lower authorities, it could be seen that the assessee has failed to make any effective representation therein. The Ld. AR has stated that the assessee has sufficient evidences to demonstrate the source of impugned investment. 3. Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice and considering the possibility of communication gaps during faceless regime, we deem it fit to afford another opportunity of hearing to the assessee to substantiate its case before Ld. AO. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the assessment is restored back to the file of Ld. AO for de novo assessment with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its case. 4. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 02-06-2025. (RAJPAL YADAV) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated : 02-06-2025. आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant
2. ŮȑथŎ/Respondent
3. आयकरआयुƅ/CIT
4. िवभागीयŮितिनिध/DR
5. गाडŊफाईल/GF

GURMEET KAUR,KURUKSHETRA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KURUKSHETRA | BharatTax