SHRI PREM SINGH RAJA,CHAMBA vs. PR.CIT, SHIMLA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had received the consequential relief and no longer wished to pursue the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT. During the hearing, it was submitted that a consequential order was passed by the Assessing Officer in favour of the assessee, granting the relief sought.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal after receiving consequential relief from the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M: This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT, Shimla dt. 19/03/2020 pertaining to A.Y 2015-16.
During the course of hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that a consequential order has since been passed by the Assessing Officer in favour of the assessee, granting the relief sought. In light of the favourable outcome, the assessee no longer wishes to pursue the present appeal and, accordingly, seeks to withdraw the same and accordingly wishes to withdraw the present challenge under section 263 of the Act. It was submitted in case the Ld. Pr CIT wishes to initiate the fresh proceeding under section 263, same would be challenged before this Tribunal or any other Court in accordance with law.
The Ld. DR did not raise any objection to the withdrawal of the appeal.
In view of the above, and since the assessee has received the consequential relief, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, and liberty is granted as prayed for.
Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 02/06/2025 मनोज कुमार अ"वाल लिलत कुमार (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (LALIET KUMAR) लेखा सद"/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "ाियक सद" /JUDICIAL MEMBER
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026