Nirmal Bot Limited, Mumbai vs DCIT | ITAT Mumbai 2021

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI

For Appellant: Ms. Hetal Vora, A.R

For Respondent: Shri Tharian Oommen, D.R

Hearing: 03/02/2021Pronounced: 03/02/2021

ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)- 24, Mumbai dated 30.04.2019, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 13.03.2015 for the assessment year 2012-13.

When this appeal was called for hearing, the ld. Authorised representative (for short “A.R”) for the assessee stated at bar that the assessee company had filed the necessary declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and is awaiting for a final resolution of the matter under the said scheme. In the backdrop of the aforesaid facts the ld. A.R had sought permission to withdraw the appeal, subject to the condition, that, in the event, if for some unforeseen reason the matter is not settled under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, then, the assessee’s right for revival of the appeal would be protected.

The ld. D.R did not object to the aforesaid submission of the counsel for the assessee.

2 Nirmal BOT Limited Vs. DCIT, Ward 15(2)(1)

NIRMAL BOT LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT WARD -15(2)(1), MUMBAI