UDHYAMAN INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 11/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 November 2020AY 2012-133 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and would withdraw the appeal in due course. Since the necessary application was already filed, the Tribunal found no purpose in keeping the appeal pending and dismissed it as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for assessment year 2012-13. During the hearing, the assessee's representative stated that an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, had been filed and requested the appeal be kept pending.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and intends to withdraw it.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI

For Appellant: Shri Charu Maheshwari, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Kanan Narayanan, D.R
Hearing: 11.11.2020Pronounced: 11.11.2020

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee IS directed against the order of CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru dated 29.10.2018 for the assessment year 2012-13.

2.

At the time of hearing, the Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has filed application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and is waiting for the certificate in Form No.3 from the Pr. CIT. Accordingly the Ld A.R submitted that the matter may be kept pending.

3.

The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the as sessee has to withdraw the pending appeal after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a Udhyaman Investments Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Page 2 of 3 copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.

4.

We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary application before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 11th Nov, 2020.

Sd/- Sd/- (N.V. Vasudevan) (Chandra Poojari) Vice President Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated 11th Nov, 2020. VG/SPS

Udhyaman Investments Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →