Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
Date of hearing 28 -01-2021 Date of Pronouncement 09/02/2021 O R D E R
Per Saktijit Dey, JM
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 30-06-2017 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24, Mumbai for the assessment year 2013-14.
2 ITA 5974/Mum/2017
The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted, the assessee has filed letter dated 27-01-2021 stating that she had filed application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 for settling the dispute arising in this appeal. Further, she submitted, Form No.3 issued by the designated authority has also been received.
Heard the parties and perused materials on record. Considering the fact that assessee has opted for settling the dispute arising in the present appeal under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2010 and form No.3 has already been issued by the disgnated authority, we are inclined to dismiss this appeal as withdrawn. However, in the unlikely event of the dispute not been resolved, liberty is granted to the assessee to seek recall of this order and restoration of the appeal.
In the result, appeal is dismissed with the aforementioned liberty. Order pronounced in the Open Court on this 09/02/2021. Sd/- sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (SAKTIJIT DEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated : 09/ 02/2021. Pavanan, Sr.P.S (on contract)
3 ITA 5974/Mum/2017