MR. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE BALEGARA EARAPPA,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 9(3), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn based on the assessee's request. Liberty was granted to the assessees to seek recall of the order if their applications under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act were not accepted.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by various assessees for the assessment year 2006-2007. The assessees had applied for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act and were awaiting further forms.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of appeals due to the assessee's participation in the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act settlement scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “SMC-A”, BANGALORE
Before: Shri George George K
Heard together (5 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
2 Late Mrs.Gowramma & Ors. – LH Sri.Narayanappa. ITA No.2489/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2006-2007 Late Sri.Ashoka The Income Tax Officer By L/H Sri.Narayanappa Ward 9(3) / 4(3)(5) v. Masthenahalli Village Bengaluru. Hennagara Post – 560 105 Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Rural District PAN : ASKPN3539P. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.Ningoji Rao, CA Respondent by : Sri.Ganesh R.Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department Date of Date of Hearing : 18.11.2020 Pronouncement : 18.11.2020 O R D E R These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.
The learned Counsel for the assessee has furnished letters dated 18th November, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessees have filed applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and Form No.3 is awaited. It was further stated that the appeals may be treated as withdrawn with liberty to apply for a recall, if Form 1 & 2 filed by the assessees are not accepted by the Department for any reason.
The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard.
I have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In view of the submission of the learned
3 Late Mrs.Gowramma & Ors. – LH Sri.Narayanappa. Counsel for the assessee in his letter dated 18.11.2020, I dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. The assessees are given liberty to move appropriate application for recalling the present order in accordance with law, if the assessees intend to do so.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessees are dismissed, as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Comnr. Of CT. And GST, OdishaOrissa · 2 Nov 2026
- Sanatan Bal vs. The Comnr. Of CT. And GST, OdishaOrissa · 2 Nov 2026