SRI SRINIVASA PATASHALA ASSOCIATION,MANGALURU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BENGALURU

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2426/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 November 2020AY 2019-203 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemptions) order was passed without giving the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard. Therefore, the order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application without providing a proper opportunity for the assessee to furnish required details.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemptions) provided adequate opportunity to the assessee before rejecting the application for registration under Section 12A.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B R BASKARAN

For Respondent: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Hearing: 25.11.2020Pronounced: 25.11.2020

Per N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President

1.

This appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 13.9.2019 of the CIT(Exemptions), Bangalore rejecting the application for grant of registration u/s. 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act].

2.

There is a delay of 6 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed an affidavit that the delay occurred because he was out of station on personal work in the third week of October, 2019. The delay not being inordinate and having occurred due to reasonable cause is condoned and appeal admitted.

3.

The assessee filed an application for grant of registration u/s. 12A of the Act on 28.3.2019. The CIT(E) issued a letter dated 11.9.2019 calling for various details as set out in the impugned order. The assessee was called upon to comply with the requirement which were about 14 queries on 11.9.2019 itself. It appears that the assessee did not file the required details and therefore the CIT(E) held that registration cannot be granted as he was not in a position to verify the satisfaction of various conditions laid down for grant of registration u/s. 12A.

4.

Aggrieved by the order of CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

In ground No.3, the assessee has raised the issue with regard to lack of opportunity being heard. It is clear from the impugned order that the assessee was called upon to file various details by letter dated 11.9.2019 and the impugned order has been passed on 13.9.2019. The assessee, in our opinion, had no proper opportunity of being heard and therefore the impugned order of the CIT(E) has to be set aside. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the issue of grant of registration u/s. 12A of the Act is remanded back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration in accordance with the law, after affording assessee opportunity of being heard.

6.

In the result, the appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Pronounced in the open court on this 25th day of November, 2020.

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →