SHRI KRISHNAKUMAR JAYABAARATHI,SALEM vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the AO to instruct the assessee to cure the defects and then consider the VSVS compliance. Liberty was granted to restore the appeal if the VSVS application was rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2002-03. The assessee opted for the VSVS Scheme and received Form 3, requesting the appeal be treated as withdrawn. However, the appeal was defective due to unpaid appeal fees and an unattested e-challan.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn given the assessee's intention to comply with the VSVS scheme despite appeal defects.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, Chennai in dated 13.09.2019 for the assessment year 2002-03.
At the time of hearing, None appeared for the assessee. We heard the Ld. DR. We find from the records that the assessee has submitted that it has opted for VSVS Scheme and received Form 3 on 18.02.2021, and hence pleads that the appeal may be treated as withdrawn. However, we find that the appeal is defective as the assessee failed to pay appeal fees short by Rs. 8,500/- and E-Challan was not attested. In the circumstances, when the assessee is making compliance in accordance with VSVS, we direct the AO to direct the assessee to cure the above defects and thereafter consider the compliance of VSVS. Liberty is also given to the assessee/Revenue to restore the appeal, in the event of the designated authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the assessee under section 4 of the said Act.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026