RAVIKANT CHOUDHARY,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD-6(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's submission and granted permission to withdraw the appeal. Liberty was given to restore the appeal if the application under the scheme is rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for assessment year 2013-14. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘Vivas se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee could withdraw the appeal to pursue settlement under the Vivas se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R PER S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 5, Chennai in dated 21.10.2019 for the assessment year 2013-14.
At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee inviting our attention to the letter dated 17.08.2021 submitted that the assessee wanted to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘ Vivas se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ to settle pending dispute relating to Direct Taxes and in this regard the assessee has filed Form No. 1 and Form 2 and obtained Form 3 from the designated authority. Therefore, the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn. We heard the Ld. DR also.
The Bench has considered the material. Since the assesee submits that he has obtained Form No. 3 and seeks withdrawal of appeal, therefore, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, supra, as withdrawn. However liberty is given to the assessee/Revenue to restore the appeal, in the event of the designated authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the assessee under section 4 of the said Act.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 03rd September, 2021 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026