M/S. TESCO BENGALURU PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE 2(2), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeals after noting that the assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed appeals against demands raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 2015-16 to 2017-18. The assessee had opted to settle these issues under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the pending appeals related to demands under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) when the assessee chose to settle the matter under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVANAND SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed these appeals challenging the common order dated 31.3.2019 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-12, Bengaluru and they relate to the assessment years 2015-16 to 2017-18. The assessee is challenging the demand raised on it u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] in these three years.
The Ld. A.R. submitted that the assessee has opted to settle the issue under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and accordingly, filed the applications in Form No.1 & Form No.2 to 1186/Bang/2019 M/s. Tesco Bengaluru Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore
Page 2 of 2 prescribed under the above said Act. Further, the assessee has also received Form No.3 from the designated authority. Accordingly, the Ld. A.R. submitted that the assessee is seeking permission of the bench to withdraw the above said appeals.
We heard Ld. D.R. and perused the record.
Having regard to the submissions made by the Ld. A.R., we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeals. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as withdrawn.
In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26th Nov, 2020.
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026