DCIT-1(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S AMAZIA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

Grounds of appeal read as under :- 1. "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. CIT(A) should have kept the matter in abeyance as the department has not accepted the order of Hon'ble ITAT quashing the order under sec. 263". 2. "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. CIT(A) may be directed to adjudicate on merits if the Hon'ble High Courts upholds the order under sec. 263 and hence the appeal be restored".

Against this order the Revenue is in appeal before us.

We have heard both the counsel and perused the records. We find that learned CIT(A) has taken correct this view of the matter. There is no substance whatsoever in the Revenue’s appeal. Once the ITAT has quashed the learned CIT(A)’s order u/s. 263 of the Act. Consequent order pursuant to section 263 have no legs to stand before the ITAT. Hence, we affirm the order of learned CIT(A).

Learned Departmental Representative has contended that it may be recorded that if Hon'ble High Court reversed the ITAT order, the Revenue right should be protected. We find that if Hon'ble High Court reverses the ITAT order, the Revenue is free to take the appropriate action. No specific order by us is required in this regard at this stage.