FIRST RAND BANK LTD- INDIA BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (IT) 2(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was accepted and the Department had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2012-13. The assessee later opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY
Assessee by : Shri Jitendra Singh/ Shri Ankit Jain Revenue by : Shri Anand Mohan सुनवाई क� �त�थ/ Date of hearing : 16/02/2021 घोषणा क� �त�थ/ Date of pronouncement : 16/02/2021 आदेश/ ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY,JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the Assessment Order dated 31/01/2017 passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961,( in short ‘the Act’) for the assessment year 2012-13.
A letter dated 15/02/2021 has been received from the Authorized Representative for the assessee stating that the assessee has opted for ‘Viwad Se
2 आअसं. 2300/मुं/2017 (�न.व. 2012-13) (A.Y.2012-13) Vishwas Scheme, 2020’( in short ‘VSVS’) and hence, want to withdraw the appeal.
Shri Anand Mohan, representing the Department stated that the Department has no objection if the assessee want to withdraw appeal to avail the benefit of ‘VSVS’.
A perusal of above letter shows that the assessee’s declaration under VSVS for the impugned assessment year has been accepted and the Department has issued Form-5. In view of above, the appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on Tuesday, the 16th day of February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026