Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI N.K. PRADHANSmt. Ruchika S. Halwasia
ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M: The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-28, Mumbai, which in turn arises from the penalty order passed by the A.O under Sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 27.06.2018 for assessment year 2010-11.
The assessee has filed a letter dated 10th February, 2021, wherein it is stated that she had filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 in order to settle the aforesaid matter pending before the Tribunal and has received the certificate under sub-section (1) of Sec. 5 of Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 from the designated authority. It is stated by the assessee that in the backdrop of the aforesaid facts the captioned appeal may allowed to be withdrawn.
The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position as was canvassed before us.
In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event of the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme the assessee shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of her appeal.
2 Smt. Ruchika S. Halwasia Vs. ITO-17(3)-2