GENERAL MOTORS OVERSEAS CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (IT) 3(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee's declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was accepted and the Designated Authority issued Form-3. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for assessment year 2004-05. The assessee later informed the tribunal that they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and wished to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “I”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN.
Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri S.S.Iyengar सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 25/02/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/03/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश/ ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Mumbai (in short ‘the CIT(A) ) for the assessment year 2004- 05 confirming levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961( in short ‘the Act’).
When this appeal was taken up for hearing none had appeared on behalf of the assessee. Since it is an old appeal and none was appearing to represent the assessee in आअसं. 3296/मुं/2011 (�न.व.2004-05) (A.Y.2004-05)
the past as well, the appeal was heard with the assistance of ld. Departmental Representative. After rising of the Bench a mail dated 25/02/2021 was received from the assessee stating that the assessee has opted for ‘Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’( in short ‘VSVS’) and hence, want to withdraw the appeal.
A perusal of above mail shows that the assessee’s declaration under VSVS for the impugned assessment year has been accepted and the Designated Authority has issued Form-3. In view of above, the appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on Monday, the 1st day of March, 2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026