DCIT, HISAR vs. M/S SYNERGY WASTE MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD., HISAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the section 263 proceedings had been quashed by a previous order of the Tribunal. Consequently, the assessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 263 did not survive.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Income-tax Act. The appeal arose from an assessment order passed consequent to an order under section 263.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the assessment order when the preceding section 263 proceedings were quashed. The appeal was dismissed as the basis for the assessment order no longer existed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI
आदेश / ORDER
PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM
The present appeal filed by Revenue is against order of CIT(A), Hisar dated 07.09.2016 relating to assessment year 2009-10 against the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
The Ld.DR for the Revenue at the outset fairly pointed out that 263 proceedings have been quashed by the Tribunal.
On perusal of the record, we find that the present appeal arises from the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act i.e. consequent to the order passed u/s 263 of the Act. However, the Tribunal in relating to Assessment Year 2009-10 vide order dated 30.05.2016 has quashed 263 proceedings. Hence, the consequent order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 do not survive. Hence, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17th January 2020.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026