KANTI BIJLEE UTPADAN NIGAM LTD.,NEW DELHI vs ACIT, NEW DELHI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI M. BALAGANESH

For Appellant: Shri Rajneesh Behari Mathur, CA

For Respondent: Shri Amit Kumar Jain, Sr.D.R

PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 02.12.2016 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V, Delhi for the Assessment Year 2013-14.

During the course of hearing, at the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that he wants to withdraw the present appeal for the reason that he has been directed by the assessee to withdraw the present appeal as the appeal filed ‘Late’ in Electronic before the CIT(A)-5 has been heard and decided.

In his rival submissions, learned Department Representative did not object if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

After considering the submissions of both the parties and the material available on record, it is noticed that the counsel for the assessee has been directed by the assessee to withdraw the present appeal for the reason as mentioned above.

KANTI BIJLEE UTPADAN NIGAM LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI