THE ALL INDIA SKIN & HIDE TANNERS AND MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION,CHENNAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) WARD 2, CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee can approach the tribunal again if any injustice arises from the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. The appeal was delayed, but the delay was condoned. The assessee later opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be permitted to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU R.L. REDDY & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Chennai, in ITA Tr. No.203/18-19/CIT(A)-9 dated 28.02.2019 for the AY 2016-17.
This appeal filed by the assessee is delayed by ‘209’ days, for which, the assessee has filed Affidavit for condonation of the delay, to which, the Revenue has not raised any serious objection. Consequently, the delay in filing of the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is disposed off.
When this appeal was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad- se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
In this case, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, the assessee prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the submissions of the Assessee, the appeal filed by the Assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on the 30th day of September, 2021, in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026