← Back to search

SWATANTRATA SENANI SHAHEED CH. RANJEET SINGH VIADYA TRUST,PANCHKULA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

PDF
ITA 420/CHANDI/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 July 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH

Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Ishwar Duhan, Trustee
For Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh, CIT DR
Hearing: 10.07.2025Pronounced: 15.07.2025

PER RAJPAL YADAV, VP The present two appeals are directed at the instance of the assessee against the orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [in short ‘the CIT (Exemptions)’] dated 23.01.2025 vide which ld. CIT (Exemptions) has rejected the application of the assessee for grant of registration u/s 12AA as well as u/s 80G sub-section (5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.

ITA Nos.420 & 421/CHD/2025
A.Y.2025-26
2

2.

The Trustee of the Trust appeared in person and submitted that assessee Trust was enacted in February,2024. It was granted provisional registration u/s 12 in March,2024. It has applied for regular registration in July, 2024 and such application of the assessee has been dismissed ex-parte by the ld. CIT (Exemptions) without adjudication on merit. Since application for grant of registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) has been rejected, consequently registration u/s 80G(5) has also been rejected. 3. With the assistance of ld. Representative, we have gone through the record carefully. Since ld. CIT (Exemptions) did not adjudicate the issue on merit, rather dismissed the applications on the ground that assessee did not respond to the notices issued by the ld. CIT (Exemptions) and failed to submit requisite details, however, considering the facts and circumstances, we deem it appropriate to provide one more chance to the assessee to prosecute its case. The impugned orders of the ld. CIT (Exemptions) are set aside. Both the applications are restored to the ld. CIT (Exemptions) to ITA Nos.420 & 421/CHD/2025 A.Y.2025-26 3

re-adjudicate on merit after providing due opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
4. In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 15.07.2025. (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL)
VICE PRESIDENT

“Poonam”

आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to :

1.

अपीलाथȸ/ The Appellant 2. Ĥ×यथȸ/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयुÈत/ CIT 4. ͪवभागीय ĤǓतǓनͬध, आयकर अपीलȣय आͬधकरण, चÖडीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड[ फाईल/ Guard File

सहायक पंजीकार/

SWATANTRATA SENANI SHAHEED CH. RANJEET SINGH VIADYA TRUST,PANCHKULA vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH | BharatTax