DARSHANA S. THAKKAR,MUMBAI vs. ITO 24 (1)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal treated the appeals as dismissed and withdrawn. Liberty was granted to the assessee to have the appeals restored if the Vivad Se Viswas declaration is later declared bad in law.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020 to settle tax disputes for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The assessee obtained Form-3 from the designated authority under the scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the pendency of appeals before the ITAT in light of the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme for dispute resolution.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM &
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
These appeals in & ITA No.385/Mum/2010 for A.Y.2009-10 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-41, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-41/IT/33/2014-15 & CIT(A)-41/IT/34/2014-15 dated 29/05/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) in the matter of imposition of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act).
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 04/09/2020 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle these tax disputes for the years under consideration and had obtained Form-3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which were enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat the appeals pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeals restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed
Order pronounced in open Court on 17/02/2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026