ISHWAR PRATAPRAI MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT - CPC-TDS, GAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. Consequently, the appeals pending before the Tribunal were treated as dismissed and withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee had appealed to the ITAT against an order passed under Section 200A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee subsequently filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020, to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C‘ BENCH
Before: HON’BLE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & Shri Ishwar Prataprai Mehta
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
These appeals in 2956/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2005-06 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-59, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-59/IT-15/2018-19 dated 06/02/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act).
2956/Mum/2019 Shri Ishwar Prataprai Mehta
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter dated 08/02/2021 mentioning that assessee had preferred an application filed in form No.1 & 2 under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the years under consideration and had obtained Form No.3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat these appeals pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeals restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 22/02/2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (JUSTICE P P BHATT) (M.BALAGANESH) PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 22/02/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
2956/Mum/2019 Shri Ishwar Prataprai Mehta
More judgments on Section 200A
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026