M/S. CORNERVIEW CONSTRUCTIONS * DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-CPC, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. Consequently, the appeals were treated as dismissed and withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT concerning assessment year 2016-17. The assessee subsequently filed an application under the 'Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020' to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the pendency of appeals before the Tribunal while the assessee opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH:
These appeals in to 5368/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2016-17 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-59, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-59/IT-242 to 250/ITO(TDS)- 1(1)(4)/2017-18 dated 29/06/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.234E r.w.s.200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act).
5368/Mum/2019 M/s. Cornerview Constructions & Developers Pvt. Ltd.,
We find that the ld. AR filed a letter mentioning that assessee had preferred an application filed in form No.1 & 2 under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” to settle this tax dispute for the years under consideration and had obtained Form No.3 from the designated authority thereon, copy of which was enclosed alongwith this letter.
In view of this, we hereby treat these appeals pending before us as dismissed and withdrawn with a liberty given to the assessee to get the appeals restored in the event that assessee’s declaration made under “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme 2020” is declared bad in law in future for any reason whatsoever.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 03/03/2021 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.
Sd/- Sd/- (RAVISH SOOD) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 03/03/2021 KARUNA, sr.ps
5368/Mum/2019 M/s. Cornerview Constructions & Developers Pvt. Ltd.,
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026