Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/s. Camlin Fine Sciences Ltd. ACIT-9(2)(1) Plot No.F/11 & F/1 Mumbai. बनाम/ WICEL Compound Vs. Opp. SEEPZ Central Road Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 093 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCC-5235-E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Assessee by : Shri Kishore Rajshirke -Ld.AR Revenue by : Shri Vijaykumar Subramaniyam- Ld.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 04/03/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 04/03/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2012-13 contests the order of learned first appellate authority on certain grounds of appeal
. The assessment for the year under consideration was framed by learned Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(3)(a) on 09/05/2016.
2. The Ld. Counsel for assessee, Shri Kishore Rajshirke, at the outset, submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 for the year under consideration and therefore, the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. The Ld. DR concurred with the same.
3. In view of foregoing, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of the appeal in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons.
4. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.