GITA POWER & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1 (1), CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the losses. The overall loss remained the same, and the original return had claimed the business loss within the due date, making the assessee eligible for carry forward.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed business losses in its original return. Subsequently, in response to a notice under Section 153A, the assessee filed a revised return splitting the loss into business and short-term capital losses. The Assessing Officer denied the carry forward of these losses because the Section 153A return was filed beyond the stipulated time.
What were the issues?
Whether losses claimed in a return filed beyond the time specified in a Section 153A notice can be allowed to be carried forward to subsequent years.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Shrikant Mohta v. CIT19 citing95 Taxmann.com 224 · 2019 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
The aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [AY] 2011- 12 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Chennai [CIT(A)] dated 28/11/2019 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 30/12/2016. In this appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by the fact that losses as determined in the assessment order have not been allowed to be carried forward to the subsequent years.
The material facts are that an assessment was framed against the assessee u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A on 30/12/2016. The assessee claimed business loss of Rs.53.53 Lacs in the original return of income which was reduced to Rs.30.13 Lacs in return filed in response to notice u/s 153A. However, in this return, the assessee claimed short-term capital losses of Rs.23.40 Lacs. Consequent to disallowance u/s 14A as computed by Ld. AO, returned business loss was reduced to Rs.16.05 Lacs in the assessment order. However, Ld. AO did not allow these losses to be carried forward in subsequent years on the ground that return u/s 153A was not filed within the time specified in the notice.
During appellate proceedings, the assessee, drawing attention to the statutory provisions, sough carry forward of these losses. However, Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the stand of Ld. AO in terms of decision of Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of Srikant Mohta V/s CIT (2018; 95 Taxmann.com 224). Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 4. We find that notice u/s 153A was issued to the assessee on 07/01/2015 requiring the assessee to file the return within 15 days. The assessee has filed the return on 15/02/2015 which has led Ld. AO deny the carry forward of losses. However, it could be seen that the business loss of Rs.53.53 Lacs was claimed by the assessee in the original return filed on 26/09/2011 which was well within due date. As per this return, the assessee was entitled to carry forward these losses. In the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A, the amount of overall loss remains the same. The only difference is that the loss has been split as Business Loss and short term capital loss. These computations have been accepted by Ld. AO barring the disallowance of 14A. This being so, the lower authorities, in our opinion, we not justified in denying the carry forward of losses as claimed by the assessee. We order so. 5. The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order. Order pronounced on 11th October, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (Mahavir Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) उपा�� / Vice President लेखा सद� / Accountant Member चे4ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 11/10/2021 TLN आदेशकी4ितिलिपअ6ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ$/ The Appellant 1. '(थ$/ The Respondent 2. आयकरआयु;(अपील) / The CIT(A) 3. आयकरआयु;/ CIT– concerned 4. िवभागीय'ितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, चे4ई / DR, ITAT, Chennai 5. गाड@फाईल / Guard File 6.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026