ANAND GOYAL,NOIDA vs. ITO WARD-1(1), NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1160/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 January 2020AY 2015-163 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) is obligated to adjudicate appeals on their merits, even if the assessee has been negligent. The case was restored to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) without considering the merits of the case and without affording a proper opportunity. The assessee contended that the principle of natural justice was denied.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without a proper hearing and adjudication on merits, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B+SMC”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Jain, CA
For Respondent: Shri Umesh Takyar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 31/10/2019

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated 29.6.2018 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Noida {CIT(A)} and pertains to assessment year 2015- 16.

Anand Goyal vs ITO 2.0 At the outset, the Ld. AR submitted that this appeal has been dismissed by the Ld. CIT (A) without considering the merits of the case and without affording proper opportunity to the assessee. It was submitted that principle of natural justice was denied in this case and the order of the AO was upheld without examining the issues.

3.0 The Ld. Sr. DR , on the other hand submitted, that the contention of the AR was not correct in as much as the assessee did not avail the various opportunities afforded by the Ld. CIT (A) and even failed to provide the required details.

4.0 Having heard both the parties, it is our considered opinion that the Ld. CIT (A) was duty bound to examine and adjudicate the case on the merits rather than simply following the order of the AO even though the assessee might have been negligent in pursuing his case. The Ld. CIT (A) is under mandate to adjudicate the issues before him on merits. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we restore the appeal to the file of the Ld. CIT (A) with the direction to adjudicate the appeal on merits after giving proper opportunity to the assessee. The Assessee is also Anand Goyal vs ITO directed to cooperate in the first appellate proceedings when he is called upon to do so.

5.0 In the final result the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 27th January, 2020

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →