SUNIL DHANRAJ SHIVNANI,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 3, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 795/PUN/2018Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 November 2022AY 2013-144 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found the reasons for non-compliance to be genuine and circumstantial. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the matter was remanded back for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A) despite multiple opportunities, resulting in an ex parte order. The assessee later submitted an affidavit explaining the non-compliance was circumstantial and not intentional.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) should be upheld or set aside due to the assessee's genuine reasons for non-appearance.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri B.C. Malakar
For Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

ORDER

PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.

This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Pune dated 09-02-2018 for A.Y. 2013-14 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

2.

Parties heard and the order is pronounced in the Open Court.

3.

It is observed from the order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 09-02-2018 that it is an ex parte order. That, as evident from para 5 of the said order, several opportunities were provided to the assessee. The assessee has not attended the hearing before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) has therefore, not got an opportunity to substantially decide the rights and liabilities of the parties in this case. When the matter had come up for hearing before us on an earlier occasion, we had directed the ld. Counsel for the assessee to submit the reasons for non-compliance before the first appellate authority by filing an Affidavit. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has now complied with the Shri Sunil D. Shivani A.Y. 2013-14 directions of the Bench and has filed an Affidavit submitting the reasons for non-compliance of hearing notices before the ld. CIT(A).

4.

We have gone through the contents of the said Affidavit and find that it is a fit case to remand the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication as per law. The reasons contained in the Affidavit brings out the fact that the non-compliance of hearing notices before the ld. CIT(A) was neither intentional nor deliberate and absolutely circumstantial. The Income-tax Act being a welfare legislation, we are of the considered view that one final opportunity should be given to the assessee. We set aside the order of the ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to his file to re-adjudicate as per law and at the same time, we also direct the assessee to be present before the ld. CIT(A) with all relevant documents and evidences for substantially representing his case on merits. Grounds of appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on this 25th day of November, 2022

Sd/- sd/- (INTURI RAM RAO) (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune; Dated, the ___ November 2022 Ankam

Shri Sunil D. Shivani A.Y. 2013-14

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →