Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “A” BENCH,
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI
ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; Appeal of the assessee is assailed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, [for short “CIT, (A)”] dt.06/01/2017 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [for short “the Act”] which dove out of assessment order dt.20/01/2016 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act was passed by Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Latur Circle, Latur [for short “AO”] for the assessment year [for short “AY”] 2013-14.
At the outset, the learned representative for the assessee [for short “AR”] referring to the withdrawal application dt.29/11/2022 ITAT-Pune Page 1 of 2
Mahesh Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. prayed for withdrawal of the appeal reiterating the contents thereof, recording no objection from the learned departmental representative [for short “DR”] in allowing the withdrawal, we order accordingly.
Resultantly, the appeal of the appellant assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. In terms of rule 34 of ITAT Rules, the order pronounced in the open court on this Thursday 01stday of December, 2022.
-S/d- -S/d- S. S.GODARA G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे/ PUNE ; ददनाांक / Dated : 01stday of December, 2022. आदेशकीप्रधिधलधपअग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपीलाथी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent.
3. The Pr. CIT-2 Aurangabad(Mh-India)4. The CIT(A)-2, Aurangabad(Mh-India) 5. दवभागीयप्रदतदनदध,आयकरअपीलीयन्यायादधकरण, पुणे“ए”बेंच/ DR, ITAT, Pune“A”Bench, 6. गार्डफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / By Order, वररष्ठ दनजी सदचव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय न्यायादधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
ITAT-Pune Page 2 of 2