SOLAPUR DISTRICT POLICE EMPLOYEES CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY,SOLAPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -4, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 277/PUN/2022Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 December 2022AY 2017-183 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that a cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on interest income earned from deposits with other cooperative societies, even after the insertion of Section 80P(4). The PCIT's order was not justified.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P on interest income earned from deposits with other cooperative societies. The PCIT invoked Section 263, deeming the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society from deposits with another cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P, and if the PCIT was justified in revising the assessment order under Section 263.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 263,Section 80P(4),Section 80P(2)(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Respondent: Shri Rajarshi Dwivedy

Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Rajarshi Dwivedy Date of hearing 13-12-2022 Date of pronouncement -12-2022 ORDER

PER SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee emanates from the order of the ld. Pr. C.I.T. – 4, Pune dated 21-03-2022 passed u/s.263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) for A.Y. 2017-18.

2.

Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Cooperative credit society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The assessee filed return declaring total income at Nil after claiming deduction u/s.80P for a sum of Rs.37,92,216/-. The assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.143(3) at the declared income. The ld. PCIT, on examination of records, observed that the assessee claimed deduction u/s.80P to the tune of Rs.37,92,216/- on interest income earned from deposits kept with cooperative societies. He, therefore, opined that, the assessment order, allowing deduction u/s.80P on such interest income, was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Setting aside the assessment order, he directed the AO to pass the assessment order afresh as per law after allowing opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has approached the Tribunal.

Sholapur Dist. Police Employees Credit Co-op. Society

3.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We have heard the ld. D.R. and perused the material available on record. The assessee is admittedly a Cooperative credit society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The ld. PCIT has held the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue only on the ground that the claim of deduction u/s.80P on interest income amounting to Rs.37,92,216/- was not in order. In this regard, it is observed that though co-operative banks, other than primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, are not eligible for deduction pursuant to insertion of section 80P(4) w.e.f. 1.4.2007, but this provision does not dent the otherwise eligibility u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act of a co-operative society on interest income on investments/deposits parked with a co- operative bank, which is a registered co-operative society as per section 2(19) of the Act, defining co-operative society to mean a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 or under any law for the time being in force. The assessee is also a Co-operative society registered.

4.

Similar view has been taken by the Pune Benches of the Tribunal in several cases including The Sesa Goa Employees Coop. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITA No.203/PUN/2019, order dated 16-11-2022). In view of the foregoing discussion, we are satisfied that the AO rightly allowed deduction u/s.80P(2)(a) on interest income and the ld. PCIT was not justified in interfering with the same. The impugned order is set aside. 5. In the result, the appeal is allowed.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 14th December, 2022. Sd/- sd/- (R.S. SYAL) (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, dated the14th day December 2022. Ankam

Sholapur Dist. Police Employees Credit Co-op. Society

More judgments on Section 80P

All 5,069 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →