SOLAPUR DISTRICT POLICE EMPLOYEES CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY,SOLAPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -4, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on interest income earned from deposits with other cooperative societies, even after the insertion of Section 80P(4). The PCIT's order was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P on interest income earned from deposits with other cooperative societies. The PCIT invoked Section 263, deeming the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society from deposits with another cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P, and if the PCIT was justified in revising the assessment order under Section 263.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Rajarshi Dwivedy Date of hearing 13-12-2022 Date of pronouncement -12-2022 ORDER
PER SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
This appeal filed by the assessee emanates from the order of the ld. Pr. C.I.T. – 4, Pune dated 21-03-2022 passed u/s.263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) for A.Y. 2017-18.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Cooperative credit society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The assessee filed return declaring total income at Nil after claiming deduction u/s.80P for a sum of Rs.37,92,216/-. The assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.143(3) at the declared income. The ld. PCIT, on examination of records, observed that the assessee claimed deduction u/s.80P to the tune of Rs.37,92,216/- on interest income earned from deposits kept with cooperative societies. He, therefore, opined that, the assessment order, allowing deduction u/s.80P on such interest income, was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Setting aside the assessment order, he directed the AO to pass the assessment order afresh as per law after allowing opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has approached the Tribunal.
Sholapur Dist. Police Employees Credit Co-op. Society
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We have heard the ld. D.R. and perused the material available on record. The assessee is admittedly a Cooperative credit society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members. The ld. PCIT has held the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue only on the ground that the claim of deduction u/s.80P on interest income amounting to Rs.37,92,216/- was not in order. In this regard, it is observed that though co-operative banks, other than primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, are not eligible for deduction pursuant to insertion of section 80P(4) w.e.f. 1.4.2007, but this provision does not dent the otherwise eligibility u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act of a co-operative society on interest income on investments/deposits parked with a co- operative bank, which is a registered co-operative society as per section 2(19) of the Act, defining co-operative society to mean a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 or under any law for the time being in force. The assessee is also a Co-operative society registered.
Similar view has been taken by the Pune Benches of the Tribunal in several cases including The Sesa Goa Employees Coop. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITA No.203/PUN/2019, order dated 16-11-2022). In view of the foregoing discussion, we are satisfied that the AO rightly allowed deduction u/s.80P(2)(a) on interest income and the ld. PCIT was not justified in interfering with the same. The impugned order is set aside. 5. In the result, the appeal is allowed.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 14th December, 2022. Sd/- sd/- (R.S. SYAL) (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, dated the14th day December 2022. Ankam
Sholapur Dist. Police Employees Credit Co-op. Society
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026