M/S. GYANENDRA PANDEY (HUF),MEERUT vs. CIT, MEERUT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal, stating that the Assessing Officer had reduced the demand to NIL after an order under Section 263.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee after the assessment demand was reduced to NIL.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘C BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER,
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals], Meerut dated 08.12.2016 pertaining to assessment year 2012-13.
Vide application dated 27.01.2020, the assessee through ld. counsel for the assessee has contended that order u/s 263 of the I.T.
Act was passed by the CIT, Meerut in which the assessment was set aside to the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer assessed the income and reduced the demand to NIL. In view of the above, the ld. counsel for the assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
The ld. DR raised no objection.
On such concession, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 03.02.2020.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026