DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. ALLIED NOVATECH PRIVATE LIMITED, CHANDIGARH
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the deletion of the addition. It was observed that the Revenue had accepted the assessee's purchases, stock, books of account, and sales. Therefore, when the sales generating cash were accepted, depositing these proceeds into the bank account cannot be treated as unexplained, especially when the books were not rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in retail trade, faced an addition of Rs. 1,83,95,000/- under Section 69A by the Assessing Officer for unexplained cash deposits made during October/November 2016 (demonetization period). The AO alleged these deposits were from unexplained sources and the assessee booked bogus sales. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, stating that the AO was wrong in not accepting the declared cash sales recorded in the books of account without formally rejecting the books.
What were the issues?
Whether an addition under Section 69A for cash deposits from cash sales is justified when the assessee's books of account, including purchases, stock, and sales, have been accepted by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘A’, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDEN & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
609-Chd-2024 Allied Novatech Pvt. Ltd. Chandigarh. 8
Draft dictated 8.8.2025 Sr.PS 2. Draft first placed before author 3. Approved draft comes to Sr.PS/PS 4 Final draft placed before author 5. Order signed and pronounced on 6 File sent to the Bench Sr.PS Clerk 7. Date on which file goes to the AR 8. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 9. Date of dispatch of Order
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026