← Back to search

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IN SITU), CL-I, , LUDHIANA vs. MAHESH GOYAL, LUDHIANA

PDF
ITA 154/CHANDI/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 August 20252 pages

1

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

PHYSICAL HEARING

BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM
AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.154/CHANDI/2025
(िनधाŊरण वषŊ / Assessment Year: 2014-15)
JCIT (In- situ)
Circle-1,
Ludhiana.

बनाम/
Vs.
Shri Mahesh Goyal
4th Floor, Surya Commercial Centre
Opp. PAU Gate No -1
Ferozepur Road, Ludhiana
̾थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. ABGPG-2297-L
(अपीलाथŎ/Appellant)
:
(ŮȑथŎ / Respondent)

अपीलाथŎकीओरसे/ Appellant by :
Smt. Priyanka Dhar (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
ŮȑथŎकीओरसे/Respondent by :
None

सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
05-08-2025
घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
18-08-2025

आदेश / O R D E R

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 04-12- 2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] on best judgment basis u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 31-03- 2022. The Ld. AO assessed the income of the assessee by making addition of Rs.230.60 Lacs. The assessee failed to make any effective representation during the course of assessment proceedings. The Ld. CIT(A), considering assessee’s submission and evidences, exercised remand power in terms of proviso to Sec.251(1)(a) and directed Ld. AO to make fresh assessment. So aggrieved, the revenue is in further appeal before us. 2. We are of the considered opinion that the assessment was framed on best judgment basis and the assessee filed fresh submissions / evidences during first appeal. Since the same would have material bearing on the assessment of the assessee, Ld. AO was directed to make fresh assessment. In our opinion, on the facts of the case, the power of remand has validly been exercised by Ld. CIT(A) and we find no infirmity in the same. 3. The appeal stands dismissed. Order Pronounced on 18-08-2025. (LALIET KUMAR) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 18-08-2025. आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant
2. ŮȑथŎ/Respondent
3. आयकरआयुƅ/CIT
4. िवभागीयŮितिनिध/DR
5. गाडŊफाईल/GF

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IN SITU), CL-I, , LUDHIANA vs MAHESH GOYAL, LUDHIANA | BharatTax