CHANNAN SINGH, ,SANGRUR vs. JAO INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD SUNAM, PUNJAB
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the confirmation of the addition was without sound logic as the source of cash withdrawal (Rs. 30 Lacs) was not doubted, and the bank credit forming the source was also not questioned.
What were the facts?
The assessee deposited Rs. 7.50 Lacs cash into their bank account on 30-04-2011. The Assessing Officer added this amount to the assessee's income as unexplained money. The assessee claimed the deposit was sourced from earlier cash withdrawals of Rs. 30 Lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of cash deposit as unexplained income is justified when the assessee provides evidence of prior cash withdrawal as its source, even if the reason for withdrawal is not explained.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
(िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Shri Channan Singh ITO Ward Sunam बनाम/ 125, Ward No 7, Koko Majri, Sunam Mata Modi Road, Preet Nagar Vs. Sangrur-148028 Sunam, Sangrur. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.CXUPS-2467-L (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal (Advocate) -Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 02-09-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 04-09-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 24-03-2025 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 30-12-2018. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, the appeal is disposed-off as under.
During assessment proceedings, Ld. AO noted that the assessee deposited cash of Rs.9.80 Lacs in its bank account out of which an amount of Rs.7.50 Lacs was deposited on 30-04-2011. The Ld. AO added the same to the income of the assessee as unexplained money for want of any evidences as forthcoming from the assessee. The declared agricultural income of Rs.3.50 Lacs was assessed as ‘Nil’ for the same very reason.
During first appeal, the assessee’s additional evidences were subjected to remand proceedings wherein Ld. AO opposed admission of additional evidences and reiterated the assessment so framed against the assessee. The assessee pointed out that the deposit of Rs.7.50 Lacs was sourced out of earlier withdrawals of Rs.30 Lacs on 18-04-2011. However, Ld. CIT(A) rejected the same on the ground that the returned income was not commensurate with cash withdrawals and the assessee did not explain the reason for withdrawal of Rs.30 Lacs. Accordingly, the addition was confirmed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. 4 The undisputed fact that emerges is that the assessee has withdrawn cash of Rs.30 Lacs around 12 days back from the date of impugned deposit. The source of withdrawal has not been doubted. The only reason to reject the claim is that the assessee did not explain the reason for withdrawal of Rs.30 Lacs. Further, the returned income is alleged to be not commensurate with the cash withdrawals. This is despite the fact that the credit in bank account which forms the very source of cash withdrawals has not been questioned by any of lower authorities. Therefore, the confirmation of impugned addition is without any sound logic or reasoning. This being so, we delete the impugned addition of Rs.7.50 Lacs. No other ground has been urged in the appeal. 5. The appeal stand allowed. Order pronounced on 04-09-2025 Sd/- Sd/- (LALIET KUMAR) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 04-09-2025 आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITAT CHANDIGARH
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026