YASHUDEV ENTERPRISES,AMLOH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, MANDI GOBINDGARH, MANDI GOBINDGARH
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the higher tax rate under Section 115BBE could not be justified as the notification prescribing it came into force after the survey and the surrender. Additionally, the AO had not disturbed the head of income. The AO was directed to accept the surrender as normal business income.
What were the facts?
The assessee offered additional income of Rs. 33 Lacs based on a survey conducted on 21-10-2016, arising from discrepancies in stock, cash, and unaccounted investment. The dispute arose over the applicable tax rate, with the assessee claiming the normal rate and the AO insisting on the higher rate of 60% under Section 115BBE.
What were the issues?
Whether the higher tax rate of 60% under Section 115BBE can be applied to income surrendered during a survey conducted before the effective date of the relevant notification.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/s Yashudev Enterprises DCIT-Circle Mandi Gobindgarh बनाम/ Vs. Bye Pas Road, Amloh New Libra Kothi Fatehgarh Sahib (Punjab) 147310 Railway Road, Sirhind �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAAFY-7590-H (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/Appellant by : Shri Ashwani Kumar (CA) – Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Dr Ranjit Kaur (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 03-09-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 22-09-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 20-05-2025 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. AssessingOfficer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 06-11-2019. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, the appeal is disposed-off as under.
The assessee was subjected to survey u/s 133A on 21-10-2016 wherein the assessee offered additional income of Rs.33 Lacs. The assessee honored the surrender and offered additional income to tax in its return of income. The surrender was on account of discrepancy in stock / cash & unaccounted investment in construction. The assessee offered the surrendered income as income arising out of normal business activities and accordingly, credited the same to its Profit & Loss Account. The dispute arose on account of rate of taxation. The assessee applied normal rate of tax whereas Ld. AO held that the surrender of Rs.33 Lacs would be subjected to higher rate of tax of 60% u/s 115BBE. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the stand of Ld. AO against which the assessee is in further appeal before us.
It emerges that the survey has happened on the assessee on 21-10- 2016 whereas notification prescribing higher rate of tax has come into force vide Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Bill, 2016, notification dated 28-11-2016. In other words, the higher rate has been prescribed later on whereas the surrender has been made for income arising to the assessee prior to that date. Secondly, Ld. AO has not disturbed the head of income in the assessment order and there is no discussion in this respect. For both the reasons, the application of higher tax rate of 60% as prescribed u/s 115BBE could not be held to be justified. The Ld. AO is directed to accept the surrender as normal business income only.
The appeal stand allowed. Order pronounced on 22-09-2025.
More judgments on Section 133A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Amr Infrastructures, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 818/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Vikaskumar Macwan, Nadiad vs Dc/ACIT Central Circle 3, VadodaraITA 2022/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026