ANIL ASSUDOMAL MANGHNANAI,MUMBAI vs. ITO - 19(1)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal at this stage due to the assessee opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal if the scheme declaration fails to mature.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and filed a declaration. The Department had no objection to the assessee availing this benefit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed in light of the assessee opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: VIKAS AWASTHY
Assessee by : Letter dated 26/03/2021 Revenue by : Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra सुनवाई क� �त�थ/ Date of hearing : 30/03/2021 घोषणा क� �त�थ/ Date of pronouncement : 30/03/2021 आदेश/ ORDER
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Mumbai ( in short ‘the CIT(A)’) dated 12/06/2019 for the assessment years 2010-11.
A letter dated 26/03/2021 has been received from the assessee stating that the assessee has opted for ‘Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’( in short ‘VSVS’). The declaration has already been filed under VSVS and Form-3 is awaited.
Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra representing the Department stated that the Department has no objection if the assessee want to avail the benefit of ‘VSVS’.
2 आअसं. 5673/मुं/2019 (�न.व. 2010-11) (A.Y.2010-11)
In view of the fact that the assessee has opted for VSVS and has already filed declaration, the appeal by assessee is dismissed at this stage.
Liberty is granted to the assessee to revive the appeal in the event declaration filed by the assessee under VSVS fails to mature. It is further made clear that if the assessee /appellant seeks to restore the appeal in the event assessee’s declaration made under VSVS is not accepted, the Registry shall not insist for filing application for condonation of delay, if the Miscellaneous Application for recalling the order is filed beyond time on account of delay in communication of outcome under VSVS. [ Re. M/s. Nannusamy Mohan(HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A No.372 of 2020 decided on 16/10/2020 by Hon’ble Madras High Court]
In the result, appeal by assessee is dismissed, with the liberty aforesaid.
Order pronounced in the open court on Tuesday, the 30th day of March, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026