BELAIR CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE III(4), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 391/CHNY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 October 2021AY 2010-113 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Since the assessee had settled the dues under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT, which was delayed. The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and paid the dues, leading to the issuance of Form No. 5.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI DUVVURU R.L. REDDY & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA

Hearing: 26.10.2021

PER DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

The assessee filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai, in 154, 155, 156, 157, 158 & 159/14-15 dated 17.07.2017 for the AY 2010-11.

2.

This appeal filed by the assessee is delayed by ‘139’ days, for which, the assessee has filed Affidavit for condonation of the delay, to which, the Revenue has not raised any serious objection. Consequently, the delay of ‘139’ days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is disposed off on merits.

3.

When this appeal was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee vide letter dated 11.10.2021 submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and accordingly, the assessee paid the dues under Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the designated authority has issued Form No.5 on 01.10.2021. Thus, it was prayed for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. The learned DR fairly conceded the contents of the above letter of the assessee.

4.

We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the Form No.5.

5.

We find that the assessee has already paid the dues under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, thereby, the designated authority has issued Form No.5 and thus, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

3 :: 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced on the 26th day of October, 2021, in Chennai.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →