MAHARASHTRA BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 6(5), PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following its own precedent in the assessee's own case for a previous assessment year, held that the interest income earned from deposits with a bank was eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income earned on deposits kept with a bank. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, stating it was not eligible.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative credit society from deposits with a bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER R.S. SYAL, VP: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16-03-2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2018-19. 2. The only issue raised in this appeal is against the denial of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) in respect of interest income of
Maharashtra Bank Employees Co.op Credit Society Ltd., Rs.5,59,36,832/- received on deposits kept with Bank of Maharashtra.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee furnished its return declaring total income at Nil after claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the deduction was claimed with reference to interest income earned from banks which was not eligible for deduction u/s.80P. He, therefore, dismissed the assesee’s claim which came to be countenanced in the first appeal.
We have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that similar issue came up for consideration before the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2014-15 (ITA No.1763/PUN/2017, order dated 06-08-2019) albeit in the appeal preferred by the Revenue. After examining the relevant points and following other orders passed by the Pune Benches, the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of deduction u/s.80P on such interest income. Both the sides are in agreement that the facts and circumstances are similar. Respectfully following the precedent, we overturn the impugned order and direct to grant the deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) on such interest income.
Maharashtra Bank Employees Co.op Credit Society Ltd.,
In the result, the appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 20th December, 2022.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Ramawtar Agrawal vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- Lakhan Lal vs. Union Of INDIAChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026