JAI KUMAR,DELHI vs. CIT(A)-38, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not given sufficient opportunity to the assessee. Therefore, the issues were set aside to the CIT(A) to be decided afresh after providing adequate opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged a penalty imposed by the CIT(A) related to cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 and late payment of EPF. The assessee argued that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without providing sufficient opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty was rightly imposed on cash payments and late EPF payments. Whether the CIT(A) provided adequate opportunity to the assessee before passing the order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘SMC’ BENCH, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S. SIDHU
This appeal is filed by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals-38], New Delhi dated 24.1.2019 pertaining to assessment year 2013-14 on the following grounds:-
1. Because the action is being challenged on facts and law, for confirming the penalty amounting to Rs. 93793/- on account of cash payments made by assessee in excess of Rs. 20000/- u/s. 40A(3) of Income Tax Act, and on account of late payment of EPF amounting to Rs. 54671/-.
2. That the addition under section 40A(3) being made under the deeming provisions, the penalty u/s. 271(1)© is not eligible on the same.
3. That in any case the addition of Rs. 54671/- on account of late payment of EPF having been deleted by the CIT(A), no penalty on the same can be levied.
4. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the grounds of appeal. PRAYER For ay consequential relief and / or legal claim arising out of this appeal and for any addition, deletion, amendment and modification in the grounds of appeal before the disposal of the same in the interest of substantial justice to the assessee.
2. At the time of hearing Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that Ld. CIT(A) has passed the exparte impugned order without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee. He requested that the issues in dispute may be set aside to the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh, after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
3. On the contrary, Ld. DR relied upon the impugned order.
4. I have heard both the parties and perused the orders of the authorities below. I am of the view that Ld. CIT(A) has not given sufficient opportunity to the assessee, therefore, in the interest of justice I am setting aside the issues in dispute to the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh after giving adequate opportunity of being herd to the assessee. 4.1 Keeping in view of the non-cooperation of the assessee, I am directing the assessee through his counsel to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on 23.04.2020 at 10.00 am for hearing. There is no need to issue the notice by the Ld. CIT(A) to the assessee, since this order has already been pronounced in the open court.
More judgments on Section 40A(3)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Saiyed Zaharul Alam, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2233/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- M/S Sadana Electric Store, Lucknow vs DCIT Range-6, LucknowITA 283/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Nagendra Prasad, Patna vs ITO Ward -5(3) Patna, Dak BanglowITA 362/PAT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026