ACIT (LTU)-2, MUMBAI vs. M/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIAL LTD., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals were not maintainable due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The circular is also applicable to pending cases.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed three appeals before the ITAT against orders of the CIT(A). The tax effect in these appeals was below Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether revenue appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs are maintainable before the Tribunal as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM:
These three appeals are filed by the revenue against the order separate orders of CIT(A)-57, Mumbai passed u/s 248 and 250 of the Income Tax Act. , 5689 & 5690/Mum/2019 Reliance Industries ltd., Mumbai.
At the time of hearing, it was brought to the knowledge of the Bench that, the tax effect in the appeal is below Rs.50 lakhs, therefore covered by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. We find as per the CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019, no appeal shall be filed by the revenue before the Hon’ble Tribunal where the tax effect is below Rs 50 lakhs. Further the circular of the CBDT is also applicable to the pending cases.
Accordingly, we dismiss the revenue appeals on maintainability and low tax effect.
Incase, if the revenue is able to provide evidence that the case falls under any of the exceptions provided in the circular issued by the CBDT. The revenue may prefer miscellaneous application for recalling of this order, if they so desire, in which circumstances, this order shall be recalled by the Hon’ble Tribunal. , 5689 & 5690/Mum/2019 Reliance Industries ltd., Mumbai. 3. In the result, all the three appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 248
- Kilari Lakshmi Suthaa, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 4(1)(3)…ITA 1447/BANG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Kilari Lakshmi Suthaa, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 4(1)(3)…ITA 1446/BANG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Kilari Lakshmi Suthaa, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 4(1)(3)…ITA 1445/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Indian Oil Adani Ventures Limited (Formerly… vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1480/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO It 1.2.2, Mumbai vs Bennett Coleman & Co Ltd, MumbaiITA 5257/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026