SUKHWINDER SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the principles of natural justice and the ex-parte nature of the lower authorities' orders, restored the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The assessee was directed to present and prove their case effectively.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the assessee for Assessment Year 2013-14 against an ex-parte assessment order passed by the AO under section 144 read with section 147 of the Act, which was also upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee contended that they were unable to represent their case before the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment order passed by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) should be set aside on the grounds of natural justice, and the matter should be remanded for a fresh assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
आदेश / O R D E R
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2013- 14 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 04-12-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] on best judgment basis u/s 144 read with Section 147 of the Act on 23-09-2021. The registry has noted delay of 8 days in the appeal which stands condoned. The only prayer of Ld. AR is to restore the matter back to the file of Ld. AO since the orders of lower authorities are ex-parte orders. The Ld. AR stated that the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case if another opportunity is granted to the assessee. The Ld. Sr. DR opposed any interference in the impugned order.
In the assessment order, Ld. AO has assessee income of Rs.40.01 Lacs for cash deposits and bank interest since the assessee fail to make any representation therein. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for the same very reasons. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before Tribunal.
Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice and considering the background of the assessee, I deem it fit to accept the prayer of Ld. AR. Accordingly, the assessment is restored back to Ld. AO for de novo assessment with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its case forthwith.
The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 25th November, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026