BHAJAN LAL,SIRSA vs. ITO WARD - 1 , SIRSA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since TDS was deducted against the assessee's payment and it was the assessee's money that was deducted, the credit for the TDS is allowable to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee, acting as a commission agent (Kaccha Arhtia), appealed against the denial of TDS credit of Rs. 42,726/-. The CIT(A) denied the credit, citing that TDS certificates were not issued in the assessee's name, despite the assessee being the one whose money was deducted.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS credit is allowable to a commission agent when TDS has been deducted on gross receipts not belonging to the agent, but on their behalf.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 154,Section 37BA(2),Section 194Q
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2022-23) Shri Bhajan Lal ITO Ward-1, Sirsa बनाम/ Vs. 94-B, Anaj Mandi, Ellenabad, Sector-20, HUDA Sirsa, Haryana-125102 Sirsa, Haryana-125055 �ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAJPL-4163-A (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Kartik Garg (CA) (Virtual) – Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Dr. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 25-11-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 25-11-2025 : आदेश / O R D E R
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2022- 23 arises out of an order of Ld. Addl. / JCIT (Appeal), Pune dated 19- 08-2025 in the matter of a rectification order passed by CPC u/s 154 on 05-05-2023 denying TDS credit of Rs. 42,726/- as claimed by the assessee. Having heard rival submissions, the appeal is disposed-off as under.
It could be seen that Ld. CIT(A) has denied the credit by invoking Rule 37BA(2) since the assessee acted as commission agent and carried out sales on behalf of its principals. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld denial of TDS credit on the ground that the assessee ought to have got TDS certificates issued in the name of his clients.
From assessee’s pleadings, it could be seen that the assessee has acted as Kaccha Arhtia. The assessee receives payment from traders on behalf of the farmers against commission income. The commission receipts become the income of the assessee. However, few of the traders have deducted TDS u/s 194Q against gross receipts which are not the receipts for the assessee. These receipts would never be offered as revenue receipts. Nevertheless, TDS has been deducted against assessee’s payment and it is the assessee’s money which has been deducted by the traders. Therefore, the credit of the same would certainly be available to the assessee. Therefore, I direct Ld. AO to grant impugned TDS credit of Rs.42,726/-.
The appeal stand allowed. Order pronounced on 25th November, 2025.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026