KULDEEP SINGH,HAMIRPUR vs. ITO, HAMIRPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal back to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits, considering the principles of natural justice. The assessee was directed to plead and prove its case, and the issue of delay was not to be raised.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) which dismissed their appeal in limine due to a 45-day delay. The original assessment order by the AO made an addition of Rs. 18.47 Lacs on account of cash deposits.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal dismissed in limine for delay should be restored to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
(िनधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: 2015-16) Shri Kuldeep Singh ITO Hamirpur Village Loharli, Tehsil Barsar, बनाम/ Vs. Aaykar Bhawan, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur (HP) -174039 Himachal Pradesh – 177001 �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. CWZPS-9035-G (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Munish Sood (Advocate) – Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 27-11-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 27-11-2025 : आदेश / O R D E R
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2015- 16 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC [CIT(A)] dated 17-07-2025 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 10-03-2023. In the assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of cash deposit for Rs.18.47 Lacs. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for want of condonation of delay of 45 days. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The only prayer of Ld. AR is adjudication of appeal on merits which has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR. The Ld. AR has stated that the assessee is able to substantiate its case on merits.
Keeping in mind the principles of natural justice and considering the period of delay, I am inclined to accept the prayer of Ld. AR. Accordingly, the appeal is restored back to Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its case forthwith. The issue of delay would not be raised by Ld. CIT(A).
The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 27th November, 2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026